Compare Jamestown to New England Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Compare Jamestown to New England - Essay Example Many figure the town as having no pride, no positive history and as a death-haunted town marked by misery. On the hand, New England had a more Nobel idea about the town. The empire was a town of prosperity both economically and in spiritual nourishing, with morals and values that severely contradicted the state of Jamestown. Therefore, to solve the social moral decay and miseries in Jamestown brought about by economic prosperity, and as a way to salvage the face of the church of Engalnd, there sprouted a separatist group that founded a new society, which gave rise to New England. The Spanish empire in America was desirable with successful institutions and good-looking models that had great influence on the English entry model in the new colony around Jamestown and the larger Massachusetts area. The British had three elements in their mission: to conquer and take the land of the American Indians, to search for gold, which bolstered trade, and protecting the native local â€Å"savages † from the brutality of the Spanish colonizers (Lin 380). The English had misconceptions about the Spanish model of colonization, which involved overthrowing the native leaders and installing Spanish governors while maintaining the Indian political system in place (Lin, 380). The approach resulted to immense wealth for the Spanish King. This created a misconception among English leaders who tried to emulate the same model in Jamestown. They mainly conquered large areas, just as the Spanish incorporated the Indians in the English society, using them for labor and to survive, which made the English extra rich from ample resources in the colonies (Lin 380). The British colony was therefore based in Jamestown, Chesapeake Bay region. However, the Spanish model did not succeed as expected as the British had misconceived ideas about the nature and political system of the Indian Americans. In 1603, King James 1 of England, jealous of the Spanish success in the new world, sought to est ablish his own colonies in sprawling areas of North America that were untapped. The king issued the Virginia Company a charter, empowering it to own in excess of six million acres of land in North America, and this was how the British established its colony, where the King hoped the empire would benefit England from its immense resources, and ensure the English poor masses had an ideal destination for employment. This led to mass relocation of the poor from Britain to Jamestown, to position them for employment in the new empire. However, new empire was riddled with all forms of evils, with the Virginia Company directors finding an easy way to reap and create immense riches. There were massive looting and corruption cases, besides severe ravaging disease epidemics among the newcomers in the new territory. The increasing farming practices in the new British colonies gave rise to slavery, towards feeding the yawning labor gap in new firms. Therefore, Massachusetts became the first regi on to legalize use of slaves in British farms. Within a few years upon entering into America, the British stripped the blacks off any human dignity and used them as slaves, resulting to immense suffering of the blacks. The farmers whipped slaves; the clergy drawn from the England Church preached that slavery was the will of God, while the scientists proved that the blacks were inferior type of human race, even when converted to Christianity (McBee 25). Corruption and the moral decay in the church displeased many who formed

Israel and Philistine Debate Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Israel and Philistine Debate - Research Paper Example Fact 3inspite of the UN decision, Israeli public would be able not to recognize an independent state of Palestine (Hazony). Palestinian Question: Why did so many Palestinians sell their lands to the Israelis around 1948 if they really did not want Israelis to occupy lands in the area? Fact 1 A massive flow of refugees from Palestinian land to Israel resulted in the creation of a unilateral state of Israel that managed to shelter thousands of refugees from Arab nations and Palestinians (Palestinian Land). Fact 2 Hostile moods of Palestinians in 60s resulted in an unfavorable atmosphere in Israel (Whose Land?). Fact 3 Arabs did not believe in Israelis’ victory in the war and sold their lands to them having a hope to return to their homeland, which, actually was sold by their own hands. Israeli Question discussion The first fact that implies a more flexible policy conduct by Israeli is effective for putting up a conflict in Palestinians’ war for independence only in case P alestine would be ready to negotiate all core issues of their separation from Israeli. The majority of supporters of unilateral existence of Israeli and Palestinian states confirm the fact that the independence of the latter would result in a numerous chain of military conflicts or may even lead to war. Moreover, Israeli public claims that it will be able not to recognize the independence of Palestine. This fact can be justified, because this nation has sold its own land to Israeli and did not want to live as an independent nation, but now it appeals for the international community and has a clear intention to fight for its independence (Benari). With regards to the previous facts of hostile moods of Palestinians, it is hard to believe that the independent state would show tolerance to refugees, development of social programs etc (Palestinian Land). Moreover, an intention to establish an independent government could disturb Israeli’s territory. Palestinian Question discussion In the end of 40s, Israel managed to give a shelter to thousands of refugees from Palestine. In 10 years, Palestinians were not pleased by the fact that their land has already been gone, though it was their own fault and they sold their land themselves. Palestinians have deeply rooted historical bounds with Israel. This land is their motherland. The core of the conflict should not be found in the pieces of land that historically belonged to Palestinian public, but it is better to work in favor of the country, Israel, that saved this nation. Currently, Palestinians appeal for the UN and insist on â€Å"the promise it made to them six decades ago, ensuring that a just resolution for Palestinian refugees is put into effect† (The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict). Conclusion A life-long conflict between Israel and Palestine is rather challenging and represents an interesting topic for discussion. It has deep historical roots, but in order to solve it, it is desirable to look at the historical essence of the conflict. Therefore, in one way or another, but Israel has a dominance over Palestine, because it owns the land that was sold to them by Palestinians. It would be better for Palestinians to confirm the fact of their existence in terms of the state that sheltered